namespace for released packages?
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Jul 19 07:23:32 CEST 2004
Alex Hunsley wrote:
> So in my case, it would be sufficient to place all my code in a package
> named after the product? (in my case, 'Pypreweb', which hasn't been
> taken, I've checked.)
Yes, although "preweb" might be a better alternative, given that it is
clear you are talking about Python.
> I suppose the affiliation information could be a tripping point - e.g.
> if someone else takes ownership of the product, the package name (if
> derived from a doman name etc) would no longer be appropriate!
Indeed. Then, all applications using the package need to be changed.
More information about the Python-list