namespace for released packages?

"Martin v. Löwis" martin at
Mon Jul 19 07:23:32 CEST 2004

Alex Hunsley wrote:
> So in my case, it would be sufficient to place all my code in a package 
> named after the product? (in my case, 'Pypreweb', which hasn't been 
> taken, I've checked.)

Yes, although "preweb" might be a better alternative, given that it is
clear you are talking about Python.

> I suppose the affiliation information could be a tripping point - e.g. 
> if someone else takes ownership of the product, the package name (if 
> derived from a doman name etc) would no longer be appropriate!

Indeed. Then, all applications using the package need to be changed.


More information about the Python-list mailing list