using generators with format strings

Bengt Richter bokr at oz.net
Tue Jul 27 20:56:40 CEST 2004


On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:28:29 -0400, Christopher T King <squirrel at WPI.EDU> wrote:

>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, John Lenton wrote:
>
>> does anyone else get the feeling that (str %) should have a third
>> behaviour wrt generators? By this I mean that str % seq is one
>> behaviour, str % dict is another, and there should be a str % iter,
>> probably consuming items from the iterator up to the number of
>> arguments of the format string?
>
>The only argument I see against this is that it could break existing code
>of the form '%r' % some_object, where some_object could easily be an
>iterable object (say, a numarray array).  Of course, limiting it to only
>generators rather than iterators in general would fix this, but then the
>benefit gained seems too small to justify the cost of implementing another
>exception to the rule.
>

You could subtype str and override __mod__ to do it (which I'll leave
as an exercise ;-)  e.g.,

    class MYFMT(str):
        def __mod__(self, args):
            ...

and then use it like

    MYFMT('formatted string args from generator: %s %r %(mapping_key)s') % generator

Then you could make it do anything you like without changing current python, even
mixing in mapping usage if you wanted to.

Regards,
Bengt Richter



More information about the Python-list mailing list