[OT] Emacs, Eclipse, Leo (was Re: IDE
steve.menard at videotron.ca
Sat Jul 17 16:21:35 CEST 2004
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>> Ville> Too bad Emacs seems to lack the development energy these days
>> to Ville> match the features of modern IDEs.
>> Dilution of the development community by the continued rift between
>> the GNU Emacs and XEmacs folks doesn't help...
> not to mention they keep insisting on using lisp...
> seriously, Emacs has the problem of increasingly large hurdles for its
> users. I've been an Emacs users since 17.something and for many years,
> I was carrying around my .Emacs file from place to place like a hobo's
> bindlestiff. but in the past few years I've stopped. I just use
> package defaults and default packages. It's become too
> difficult to keep track of changes, update .emacs and replicate to the
> 10 or 15 machines (this month) that I'm using. Additionally, many
> packages have become just too obnoxious to configure and use especially
> with my limited hand ability. gnus and tramp have been the worst of
> recent experience.
> I do believe we could make this better by leading the way. I propose
> reworking python mode using python via the Emacs python
> extension. By lowering the barriers to entry, it's possible one could
> rejuvenate development of applications within Emacs.
> of course that doesn't solve the problem of propagating configuration
> file changes to billions of machines but that's a different problem for
> a different mailing list.
Here's an idea : how hard would it be to replace emacs's ELIP
interpreter with Python, and translate the "main" ELISP modules to python?
I would love being able to use something like emacs and custimize it to
my hearts content. ELISP, however, just does not fit in my brain.
More information about the Python-list