Idea: Python Shorthand (was Re: Why a class when there will only be one instance?

[Cameron Laird]

In article <c9ft5c$3m3gr$2 at swen.emba.uvm.edu>,
Josh Gilbert  <jgilbert+python at uvm.edu> wrote:
>Ville Vainio wrote:
			.
			.
			.
>> But isn't IPython solely for interactive use?
>> 
>Yes, you are correct. A decided limitation. You can automatically save 
			.
			.
			.
Hold on; while I'm sure we can define "interactive" in a way 
that includes all the things IPython does, I think that's
misleading.  IPython supports a WIDE variety of uses.  I don't
want someone to take the characterization above out of context 
to reach a mistaken conclusion about IPython's limits.
-- 

Cameron Laird <claird at phaseit.net>
Business:  http://www.Phaseit.net