mutable default parameter problem [Prothon]
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
qrczak at knm.org.pl
Wed Jun 16 00:34:01 CEST 2004
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:07:05 -0700, Mark Hahn wrote:
> Choice 2 is my favorite in that it matches the dynamic nature of Prothon,
> but it is an expensive solution. Choice 1 is the least expensive solution
> but it is limiting to the user. Choice 1 does not help the second code
> sample above. Choice 3 is a good compromise since an object.copy() is
> pretty fast in Prothon.
> Comments? How much Python code would these different proposals break?
I like 2 the most. Well, actually I like only 2 :-)
I'm not sure why it would be expensive, it's a pity if it's expensive,
but it should be appropriate for most cases and it's easy to understand.
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak at knm.org.pl
More information about the Python-list