OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.

John Roth newsgroups at jhrothjr.com
Thu Mar 4 17:37:42 CET 2004

"Ville Vainio" <ville at spammers.com> wrote in message
news:du73c8ofx57.fsf at mozart.cc.tut.fi...
> >>>>> "David" == David M Cook <davecook at nowhere.net> writes:
>     David> I would call it *pragmatically* implemented OOP.  It's not
>     David> "proper" as some would see it.
> Elaborate?

As I understand it, there are a number of issues.

1. Lack of method polymorphism

2. Use of built-in functions instead of "proper" methods.

3. ability to declare functions and variables at the
module level.

As far as I am concerned, 2 and 3 are so whats.
1 would be nice at times, but there's no way it's
going to happen in a language that doesn't have
static typing.

John Roth

> -- 
> Ville Vainio   http://tinyurl.com/2prnb

More information about the Python-list mailing list