A 'Python like' language
daniel at syrinx.net
Fri Mar 26 23:09:04 CET 2004
"David MacQuigg" <dmq at gain.com> wrote in message
news:o59960pt4nirvqjea79so494rtevc6mt8e at 4ax.com...
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:42:54 +0000, Peter Hickman
> <peter at semantico.com> wrote:
> >Well after all this discussion it would appear that a 'Python like'
> >language has appeared => Prothon. http://www.prothon.org/index.html
> >Very alpha, sort of like Python (if you consider the indenting is what
> >makes Python unique) and sort of Ruby in its use of prefixes to define
> >scoping etc (although there is no reference to this trait being borrowed
> >from Ruby). It also quotes Self as being an influence.
> What I found most interesting about this language is that it *doesn't
> use classes* !! All objects are derived directly from other objects,
> some of which are "prototypes", that is, objects which were designed
> to be just templates to produce other objects.
> I downloaded the interpreter, and it installed flawlessly on my XP
> machine! I ran through the examples from their webpage, and they
> worked as shown! As I am generating objects from prototypes, I am
> thinking - How can this be so simple? Surely we must need classes for
> something. What about static methods? Is all of this just cruft in
> The torture never stops. :>)
> -- Dave
That's what I love about prototype-based languages: they're just so simple.
Class-based language suffer from the meta-class complication, where in
If the Prothon people can somehow convert the Python libraries, we'll have a
very interesting situation...
More information about the Python-list