how robust is (CGIHTTPServer )

[pxlpluker]

Wilk wrote:

>pxlpluker <pxlpluker at cfl.rr.com> writes:
>
>  
>
>>    i was looking at twisted but it appears to be WAY beyond my megar
>>skills at this point.
>>so i think CGIHTTPServer will fit my needs if it is pretty stable.
>>I have a small python cgi that i was building and i had this great
>>idea of having the cgi server kinda rolled into it for various
>>portability reasons and maybe some future features that would not have
>>apache to realy on.
>>    
>>
>
>If you want to have your own server, you don't need CGI, you can start
>from BaseHTTPServer, it's very robust. I use it in production.
>CGIHTTPServer and SimpleHTTPServer are good examples to show how to
>expand BaseHTTPServer.
>  
>
I think i need cgi to run python scripts though. I am allowing file 
upload with some user management/accounts.
What kind of traffic does your site get?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20040509/926a370c/attachment.html>