Why a class when there will only be one instance?

Christian Tismer tismer at stackless.com
Thu May 27 18:05:13 EDT 2004


François Pinard wrote:

...

> It would be `self.' within the class itself, and the instance name
> within foreign classes.  This habit stresses the relations between the
> parts of the program and eases a better understanding of the whole.

Just a little observation:
If you really want the class and the instance to be the same,
well, you can take a module.
In a sense, this *is* a class and the only instance.

ciao - chris
-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/





More information about the Python-list mailing list