why python is slower than java?

Dan Perl danperl at rogers.com
Fri Nov 12 02:34:58 CET 2004


As a member of this group, I regret the comments that you got from 
"Y2KYZFR1", whatever his name is and whatever his real email address is. 
Please do not let it affect you and please do not let it affect your view of 
the group in general.


"Y2KYZFR1" <jarrodhroberson at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:c718a6cf.0411101051.3c8935fd at posting.google.com...
> Maurice LING <mauriceling at acm.org> wrote in message 
> news:<mailman.6022.1099784038.5135.python-list at python.org>...
>> >
>> > dude that "comparision" from twistedmatrix you refrence is ANCIENT!!!
>> I am wondering the impact when IBM decided that the base memory to not
>> exceed 64kb, in the late 1960s...
>> I suppose more experienced people in this list can agree that certain
>> decisions made can be almost an edict. So, there is a re-building
>> process every now and then, hopefully to by-pass such edicts. Python
>> itself is already such an example.
>> >
>> > it is comparing versions that are YEARS out of date and use!
>> Are the codebase of Python 1.5.2 and Java 1.1 totally replaced and
>> deprecated?
> yes it has, in both cases : proof again that you don't understand
> enough to comprehend why your question is irrelevant, and that you
> can't understand the answer as such.
> you can't compare something from so many years ago to each other and
> then EXTRAPOLATE the results to NOW.
> It would be like comparing a 1965 Mustang to a 1965 Corvette and then
> coming to the conclusion that you could EXTRAPLATE those results to
> compare the 2005 models. Just completely lacking in any understanding
> of scientific theory.
>> Lisp compiler is the 1st compiler to be created (according to the
>> Red-Dragon book, I think) and almost all others are created by
>> bootstrapping to LISP compiler. What are the implications of design
>> decisions made in LISP compiler then affecting our compilers today? I
>> don't know. I repeat myself, I DO NOT KNOW.
>> >
>> > you are just trolling or your don't know enough to understand the
>> > answer to your question which is way to vague to be answered, as there
>> > is no real correct answer.
>> Certainly I do not have 15 PhDs in computer science or computating
>> mathematics...... I suppose there are some syntax error in your
>> statement to allow me to parse it completely. "too vague", not "to 
>> vague".
> an this just proves that YOU are irrelvant also, go troll somewhere
> else. PLONK
>> Thanks
>> maurice 

More information about the Python-list mailing list