generic way to access C++ libs?
Diez B. Roggisch
deets.nospaaam at web.de
Tue Nov 9 08:23:47 EST 2004
> I don't think so. Given that the _definition_ of the function is in
> the header, and the header is needed to compile any code which might
> want to link with the library, the compiler has all it needs, without
> a need for a corresponding function to exist in the library.
It has been a while, but I think what happened when including such a header
on several locations that produced .o-files was that a duplicate symbol
problem arised on linking time. Why would there be a symbol at all, when
the code got "pasted" into the callee's code?
--
Regards,
Diez B. Roggisch
More information about the Python-list
mailing list