Simple thread pools
mwm at mired.org
Thu Nov 11 21:34:12 CET 2004
Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> writes:
> Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:
> All I'm saying is that you can get the same kinds of concurrency, same
> kinds of throughput, same kinds of elapsed times, etc., with an
> asynchronous approach and a single thread. I suppose 'whatever floats
> [our] boats' and 'whatever implementation presents itself in the most
> timely manner'.
Except that multi-threaded code is prone to obscure, hard-to-isolate
bugs. Having done both multi-threaded and async servers, I'll take the
async version every time.
Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
More information about the Python-list