Microsoft Patents 'IsNot'
jan.dries at dcube-resource.be
Sat Nov 20 01:21:22 CET 2004
Jeff Shannon wrote:
> Peter Maas wrote:
>> Isnot is semantically equivalent to the inequality operator which is
>> some hundred years old. I doubt that this can be an approved patent,
>> even under the liberal patent US laws.
> Maybe it's not a technically *valid* patent, but that doesn't mean it
> can't be approved. The US patent system has become appallingly lazy
> about checking for things like prior art and obviousness. (After all,
> we're talking about the system that approved a patent on "one-click
IIRC, a few years ago there was an Australian lawyer who wanted to show
the ineffectiveness of the patent application procedure in Australia,
and so he filed a patent application for the invention of some sort of
rotating device (the type that is more commonly known as "a wheel").
The application was approved.
More information about the Python-list