ConfigParser shootout, preliminary entry

Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Sat Oct 23 20:09:37 CEST 2004


Carlos Ribeiro <carribeiro <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> In my opinion, we don't have really to make a choice or a concession
> here. A simple parser can be provided, using a simple interface as the
> one defended by David; and a wrapper implementing the "configuration
> object" can also be provided, using class-based access.

Well said!  This is exactly what I was thinking while I read through this
thread.  I imagine to classes would be provided: ConfigParser, which basically
just reads an INI file and yields (key, value) pairs by section, and
ConfigObject, which uses a ConfigParser to read the INI file and then converts
this to attribute-style access.  Personally, I hate having to write in David
Wilson's suggested style:

    for key, value in self._conf.items('general'):
        if key == 'listen port': # no need for ugly underscore
            ...
        elif key == ....
            ...

and would much prefer the attribute access -- but generally, my config files
contain only one value per key.  Providing both classes allows you to use
whichever style is more reasonable to you.

Steve




More information about the Python-list mailing list