Using Python to generate code?
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 8 17:57:16 CEST 2004
Albert Hofkamp <hat at se-126.se.wtb.tue.nl> wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2004 23:51:38 -0700, Tran Tuan Anh <anhtt at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Right now, the generator program is written in C++. And I feel not so
> > comfortable with C++. I feel C++ is an overkill. Because, I need to
> > generate some code, hence in the program there are a lot of something
> > like this:
> > printf(out, "for (%s = 1, %s < %s, %s < %s )", varName, varName,
> > varName1, varname, varName2);
> > It is just too messy if I have more than 20 lines like this.
> Agreed, reached that same conclusion.
> Therefore, I switched to something like
> output="""for ($VAR = 1, $VAR < $START, $VAR < $END)"""
Uh, OT, but, doesn't this work better with semicolons than commas...?
> Obviously, this can be enhanced.
> (use other conventions than $identifier, and performing the substitution
> in a loop).
> BTW: I am not sure string.replace works OK as shown here.
Yep, though output.replace(...) would be neater. But the best
replacement is already in the Python 2.4 standard library: it uses
exactly the $identifier convention, and takes a dictionary of mapping of
identifier to string...:
In : tpl=string.Template('for ($VAR = 1, $VAR < $START, $VAR <
In : tpl % dict(VAR='foo', START='bar', END='baz')
Out: u'for (foo = 1, foo < bar, foo < baz)'
In : tpl % dict(VAR='fee', START='fie', END='fofum')
Out: u'for (fee = 1, fee < fie, fee < fofum)'
More information about the Python-list