Rejecting the J2 decorators proposal
ville at spammers.com
Wed Sep 1 09:18:35 CEST 2004
>>>>> "Guido" == Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum at gmail.com> writes:
Guido> everything remains as currently in CVS. For 2.4b1, I will
Guido> consider a change of @ to some other single character, even
Great - I bet many of those who preferred & endorsed J2 over @pie did
so because of the @ character (well, I did at least).
Guido> audience (like 3rd party library packages). Using
Guido> decorators for type annotations in particular looks
Guido> tedious, and this particular application is so important
Guido> that I expect Python 3000 will have optional type
Guido> declarations integrated into the argument list.
Looking forward to be able to vote on the syntax for those ;-).
Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
More information about the Python-list