docs on for-loop with no __iter__?
just at xs4all.nl
Tue Sep 7 09:49:16 CEST 2004
In article <mailman.2962.1094543082.5135.python-list at python.org>,
Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote:
> It would have made describing the protocol somewhat more complex, but it
> have made using the protocol in a class simpler. Moot point of course, since
> I'm fully convinced that changing the protocol is infeasible. =)
Why on earth would you want to improve a protocol that's only there for
legacy reasons, and has been replaced by something vastly better?
More information about the Python-list