Debunking Art - fraudster with python AI engine?
primz at bigpond.com
Wed Sep 1 06:56:35 CEST 2004
"Chris S." <chrisks at NOSPAM.udel.edu> wrote in message news:<4133ff91$1 at news.unimelb.edu.au>...
> Nick wrote:
> > Naturally, I find it hard to believe he has picked up on natural
> > language processing and the other various skills required to write AI
> > engines in that time. My guess is he has a python AIML interpreter,
> > and he's found a default "brain" somewhere and tweaked it with some of
> > his own stuff in order to pass it off as his own.
> So what's the problem? You make it sound like he *must* be plagerizing
> someone else's work, but PyAIML is for creating just such an interface.
> There are even free brains available. Considering the term "AI engine"
> has no official meaning, a shell powered by an AIML interpreter could
> easily be one of many possible solutions to such a setup.
Well, if I were using a cryptographic library, I wouldn't dare claim I
were a cryptographer. I may say that I had written an application that
uses a third party cryptographic component... I think in this context
he is using the fact that the chances of a technical person
questioning his work are extremely slim.
[ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]
[ that fails mail your article to <comp-ai at moderators.isc.org>, and ]
[ ask your news administrator to fix the problems with your system. ]
More information about the Python-list