Python 2.4 killing commercial Windows Python development ?

[Michael Kearns]

Do Re Mi chel La Si Do wrote:
> Hi !
> 
> This DLL come also with MS-JVM engine, who is free.  Therefore...
> 

This is very true (and the .NET suggestion as well). However, why should 
I require an end-user to install MS-JVM or the .NET framework, purely 
for a simple little launcher application ?

The main application it launches is Java, but there's no way it would 
run on the MS-JVM, and .NET just gives a load more technology that we 
don't really need (and is a bigger install than the entire application).

Michael.