Testing for presence of arguments
spammers-go-here at spam.invalid
Thu Aug 18 18:40:24 CEST 2005
Peter Maas wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion, but seems needlessly complicated for
> > something very simple.
> What is "very simple"? The problem or the solution? :) If you examine
The form of the solution.
> this suggestion more closely you will note that it is more or less
> the same as Benji York's one except Benji used a built-in class.
Many good solutions have some similarity. From the point of view of a user
trying to include some simple functionality in a already complicated
application, Benji's answer was most definitely more useful.
> If you are interested in getting help on usenet you should abstain
> from devaluating efforts to give you a useful reply. "Thanks for
> the suggestion" or even no answer would have been sufficient.
One might have thought that a truthful assessment would have been
appreciated at the other end. I myself help people on the Usenet on some
other newsgroups, and am usually welcoming of responses that offer a
relevant criticism. The exchange improves me as much as it improves them.
Thanks for the suggestion, anyways :)
More information about the Python-list