PEP: Specialization Syntax
nid_oizo at yahoo.com_removethe_
Mon Aug 8 22:18:50 CEST 2005
Bengt Richter wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:41:33 -0400, Nicolas Fleury <nid_oizo at yahoo.com_removethe_> wrote:
>>I mean should angle brackets <> like in C++, or another operator, be
> I am getting the feeling that your PEP is about a means to do something C++-like
> in python, not necessarily to enhance python ;-) IOW, it seems like you
> want the [<new syntax>] to do something like C++ <type_spec> in templates?
Yes, exactly. Actually Guido also mentionned pointy brackets:
> (BTW, I have nothing against giving python new capabilities (quite the reverse),
> but not by grafting limbs from other animals ;-)
If I look at a very recent blog entry of Guido, it seems the idea is
still in the air:
> Maybe you want hidden name-mangling of function defs according to arg types
> and corresponding dispatching of calls? I am afraid I am still not clear
> on the fundamental motivation for all this ;-)
I wrote the PEP to see if was the only one that would benefit from
generic types *before* having optional static typing in the language.
It seems I'm the only one;)
According to blog entry 86641, Guido himself is prototyping with
__getitem__. However, I cannot do the same, because the framework I use
is much more complete and keyword arguments are a must.
More information about the Python-list