Generalised String Coercion
John Roth
newsgroups at jhrothjr.com
Sat Aug 6 19:34:42 EDT 2005
"Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote in message
news:mailman.2787.1123360927.10512.python-list at python.org...
>> PEP: 349
>> Title: Generalised String Coercion
> ...
>> Rationale
>> Python has had a Unicode string type for some time now but use of
>> it is not yet widespread. There is a large amount of Python code
>> that assumes that string data is represented as str instances.
>> The long term plan for Python is to phase out the str type and use
>> unicode for all string data.
>
> This PEP strikes me as premature, as putting the toy wagon before the
> horse, since it is premised on a major change to Python, possibly the most
> disruptive and controversial ever, being a done deal. However there is,
> as far as I could find no PEP on Making Strings be Unicode, let alone a
> discussed, debated, and finalized PEP on the subject.
PEP 3000, Core Language, Bullet Point 3:
Make all strings be Unicode, and have a separate bytes() type.
John Roth
> Terry J. Reedy
More information about the Python-list
mailing list