while c = f.read(1)

Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com
Mon Aug 22 14:12:12 CEST 2005


Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 2005-08-19, Donn Cave schreef <donn at u.washington.edu>:
> 
>>In article <slrndgbole.209.apardon at rcpc42.vub.ac.be>,
>> Antoon Pardon <apardon at forel.vub.ac.be> wrote:
>>...
>>
>>>But '', {}, [] and () are not nothing. They are empty containers.
>>
>>Oh come on, "empty" is all about nothing.
> 
> 
> No it is not. There are situation where False or None should
> be treated differently from an empty sequence.
> 
> Empty can mean, "nothing yet" which should be treated
> differently from "nothomg more".
> 
> 
>>>And 0 is not nothing either it is a number. Suppose I have
>>>a variable that is either None if I'm not registered and a
>>>registration number if I am. In this case 0 should be treated
>>>as any other number.
>>>
>>>Such possibilities, make me shy away from just using 'nothing'
>>>as false and writing out my conditionals more explicitly.
>>
>>Sure, if your function's type is "None | int", then certainly
>>you must explicitly check for None.
> 
> 
> The fact is that python doesn't know which type a function is.
> So why does python guess that zero should be treated as false.
> 
Python doesn't guess. There are a range of values that will be treated, 
in a Boolean context (how perlish) as equivalent to False. If your 
function is capable of validly returning any of these values then your 
calls must be prepared to discriminate between (say) zero and False or 
None. If not, the calling experession in the "if" can be simpler.
> 
>>That is not the case with
>>fileobject read(), nor with many functions in Python that
>>reasonably and ideally return a value of a type that may
>>meaningfully test false.  In this case, comparison (==) with
>>the false value ('') is silly.
> 
> 
> No is is not. The comparison with the specific false value
> makes it easier for the reader of the code to find out what
> to expect. I also find the use of '' as false in this context
> wrong. A read can be used on all kind of objects including
> a network connection. Returning '' on a network read would
> be IMO the most natural answer to say, the network connection
> is still open but no data is available for the moment. '' here
> would mean "nothing yet" while '' is now made into "nothing more"
> 
Yes, but you are restricting the programmer's range of expression if you 
promote this as a general rule. Sometimes it's important to discriminate 
between "", (), [] and None, sometimes there is no possiblity that 
confusion will arise.

When there's no possibility of confusion you arae just picking nits 
(which I know your sense of intellectual tidiness encourages you to do ;-).

regards
  Steve
-- 
Steve Holden       +44 150 684 7255  +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC             http://www.holdenweb.com/




More information about the Python-list mailing list