Bug in email package?

[Erik Max Francis]

Roman Suzi wrote:

> I think that if any object (from standard library at least) doesn't support
> iteration, it should clearly state so.
> 
> My guess is that 'for' causes the use of 'm[0]', which is (rightfully) an 
> error...
> 
> Can this behaviour of email be considered a bug?
> Is there a good case to iterate over something useful in a message

Why would it be a bug if the documentation never stated that the object 
was iterable?

-- 
Erik Max Francis && max at alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis
   Wyrd has swept all my kin / all the brave chiefs away! / Now I must
   follow them! -- Beowulf