Class introspection and dynamically determining function arguments

Diez B. Roggisch deetsNOSPAM at
Thu Jan 20 07:50:37 EST 2005

Nick Coghlan wrote:
> If this only has to work for classes created for the purpose (rather than
> for an arbitrary class):

Certainly a step into the direction I meant - but still missing type
declarations. And that's what at least I'd like to see - as otherwise you
don't know what kind of editing widget to use for a property.

Diez B. Roggisch

More information about the Python-list mailing list