Class introspection and dynamically determining function arguments

[Diez B. Roggisch]

Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 
> If this only has to work for classes created for the purpose (rather than
> for an arbitrary class):
> 

Certainly a step into the direction I meant - but still missing type
declarations. And that's what at least I'd like to see - as otherwise you
don't know what kind of editing widget to use for a property.
-- 
Regards,

Diez B. Roggisch