why are people still using classic classes?
roy at panix.com
Wed Jan 12 22:37:33 EST 2005
Simon Wittber <simonwittber at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a legitimate use for classic classes that I am not aware of?
Is there a reason NOT to use them? If a classic class works fine, what
incentive is there to switch to new style classes? I realize it's not
much effort to put "(object)" after your class name, but I'm lazy and
don't bother. I don't see how I've been hurt by that.
Obviously, if there was some feature of new style classes I wanted to
use, it would be a different story.
More information about the Python-list