OCAMl a more natural extension language for python?

[Jelle Feringa // EZCT / Paris]

Hmmmm. Not familiar with erlang at all...

> Subject: Re: OCAMl a more natural extension language for python?
> 
> Hi !
> 
> OCAML is very complementary at Python :
> 
>     unreadable vs readable

	That's depending on how you compare; I find OCAML quite readable
compared to C / Fortran

>     functionnel vs procedural/POO/etc.

	OCAML is not a true functional language, its also OO	

>     compiled vs interpreted (or compil JIT)
>     very fast vs mean velocity

	What I'm looking for!

>     hard to learn vs easy to easy to learn
	
	Is it in comparison to C?

> Yes, OCAML is very complementary, too much, much too, complementary at
> Python...
> 
> But, C is not complementary to Python (in the same state of mind).

	So some additional arguments to the hypotheses of OCAMl being a
natural extension language to Python?

Cheers,

Jelle.