python3: accessing the result of 'if'
elephantum at dezcom.mephi.ru
Sun Jan 9 11:51:49 CET 2005
Carl Banks wrote:
> As a compromise, howabout:
> . if m > 20 where m=something():
> . do_something_with(m)
That's good, but first idea was about 'where' block that contains any
expressions, that we need, for example function definition. the syntax
you proposed has same problems as 'lambda'.
> The main problem here (as some would see it) is that you can't do
> something this:
> . if m > 20 where (def m(): a(); b()):
More information about the Python-list