What YAML engine do you use?

[rm]

rm wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
> 
>> Reinhold Birkenfeld <reinhold-birkenfeld-nospam at wolke7.net> writes:
>>
>>> For those of you who don't know what YAML is: visit http://yaml.org/!
>>> You will be amazed, and never think of XML again. Well, almost.
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh please no, not another one of these.  We really really don't need it.
> 
> 
> well, I did look at it, and as a text format is more readable than XML 
> is. Furthermore, XML's verbosity is incredible. This format is not.
> People are abusing the genericity of XML to put everything into it.
> 
> Parsing and working with XML are highly optimized, so there's not really 
> a problem in that sector. But to transfer the same data in a YAML 
> format, rather than a XML format is much more economic. But networks are 
> getting faster, right?
> 
> Nowadays, people are trying to create binary XML, XML databases, 
> graphics in XML (btw, I'm quite impressed by SVG), you have XSLT, you 
> have XSL-FO, ... .
> 
> And I think, YAML is a nice initiative.
> 
> bye,
> rm

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20868 :-)

rm