Annoying behaviour of the != operator
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Fri Jun 10 10:26:44 CEST 2005
David M. Cooke wrote:
>>To solve that, I would suggest a fourth category of "arbitrary
>>ordering", but that's probably Py3k material.
> We've got that: use hash().
> [1+2j, 3+4j].sort(key=hash)
What about objects that are not hashable?
The purpose of arbitrary ordering would be to provide
an ordering for all objects, whatever they might be.
More information about the Python-list