Favorite non-python language trick?
kveretennicov at gmail.com
Sat Jun 25 21:01:56 CEST 2005
On 6/25/05, Steven D'Aprano <steve at removethiscyber.com.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:41:58 +0200, Konstantin Veretennicov wrote:
> > On 6/25/05, Mandus <mandus at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> It is really a consensus on this; that
> >> removing map, filter, reduce is a good thing? It will render a whole lot
> >> of my software unusable :(
> > I think you'll be able to use "from __past__ import map, filter,
> > reduce" or something like that :) They don't have to be built-in.
> More likely they will be moved to something like itertools than "__past__".
> Or just define them yourself:
> def map(f, seq):
> return [f(x) for x in seq]
> def filter(p, seq):
> return [x for x in seq if p(x)]
> def reduce(f, seq, zero):
> r = zero
> for x in seq: r = f(r, x)
> return r
FWIW, these don't exactly reproduce behaviour of current built-ins.
Filter, for instance, doesn't always return lists and map accepts more
than one seq... Just my $.02.
More information about the Python-list