Python becoming less Lisp-like
Torsten Bronger
bronger at physik.rwth-aachen.de
Tue Mar 15 07:44:07 EST 2005
Hallöchen!
Ville Vainio <ville at spammers.com> writes:
>>>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Bronger <bronger at physik.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
>
> >>> There would be keywords for static and class methods, no
> >>> distinction between Unicode and non-Unicode
>
> >> You couldn't do that 15 years ago because there were no Unicode
> >> that time.
>
> Torsten> I've never said that Guido was just too stupid at that
> Torsten> time. I only said "but you can definitely see that it's
> Torsten> the oldest one". In other words, a Ruby six years older
> Torsten> than the real one would have the same problem. And who
> Torsten> knows how C# looks like in 10 years.
>
> http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PythonVsRuby
>
> seems to suggest that Python has better Unicode support than Ruby.
True. When you google for it, you read "Japanese hate Unicode".
:-/ Well, then this is an invalid example.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
More information about the Python-list
mailing list