Python becoming less Lisp-like
bronger at physik.rwth-aachen.de
Tue Mar 15 12:10:00 CET 2005
"Serge Orlov" <Serge.Orlov at gmail.com> writes:
> Torsten Bronger wrote:
>>> Interesting. I've never thought that. What parts strike you as
>> Well, with a little bit of experience in the field of programming
>> languages, you can see which elements had been added later (ie
>> years after Python's creation). Properties surely would have
>> looked *very* different 15 years ago.
>> There would be keywords for static and class methods, no
>> distinction between Unicode and non-Unicode
> You couldn't do that 15 years ago because there were no Unicode
> that time.
I've never said that Guido was just too stupid at that time. I only
said "but you can definitely see that it's the oldest one". In
other words, a Ruby six years older than the real one would have the
same problem. And who knows how C# looks like in 10 years.
But I want to program now, and this is the current situation in my
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
More information about the Python-list