(no subject)


Thu Mar 24 17:15:02 CET 2005


#! rnews 2393
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Path: news.xs4all.nl!newsspool.news.xs4all.nl!transit.news.xs4all.nl!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!attws2!ip.att.net!NetNews1!xyzzy!nntp
From: Harry George <harry.g.george at boeing.com>
Subject: Re: Getting the word to conventional programmers
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: cola2.ca.boeing.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <xqxzmwt8292.fsf at cola2.ca.boeing.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
Lines: 43
Sender: hgg9140 at cola2.ca.boeing.com
Organization: The Boeing Company
References: <pic5h2-uq9.ln1__35517.6080870025$1111493304$gmane$org at lairds.us> <mailman.730.1111521297.1799.python-list at python.org> <mailman.744.1111533471.1799.python-list at python.org> <1h80e.14637$C47.5018 at newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:58:17 GMT
Xref: news.xs4all.nl comp.lang.python:368964

"Roose" <b at b.b> writes:

> > Except from a the standard, powerful,
> > looks-good-everywhere-and-has-a-tree-widget GUI toolkit? :)
> >
> > Seriously, I think this is *very* important.
> 
> Yes, and a modern toolset/IDE.  Generators and decorators and all that are
> nice, but their usefulness pales in comparison to having a decent IDE or GUI
> toolkit.
> 
> Though I might disagree that Java has a good GUI toolkit, it has better
> tools than any language out there IMO.  And I don't really like Java
> personally.
> 
> 

"Modern toolset/IDE"?  Them's fightin' words. 

Since Babbage figured out stored programs and the transistor made them
viable, we have learned a crucial lesson: Whatever you want to think
about, make sure it can be programmed.  Do NOT require
human-in-the-loop.

>From this perspective a mouse-driven GUI for generating code or GUI
designs is a horse-and-buggy concept.  Instead, a programmer uses
dynamic programming and (as needed) static code generation.  He/she
captures rules needed to generate appropriate GUIs and only
hand-tweaks the results when the rules cannot be fully understood
(artistic stylings).

Now, what is the best way to capture rules and algorithms?  It is a
powerful-yet-succinct language in an editor which supports a fast
think-edit-run cycle.  IDEs do a lot of things but generally don't win
this contest; text editors do.  Give me python in emacs any day.  Let
my Extreme Programming partner use whatever editor he/she likes, and
we'll refresh our editor buffers when we change chairs.  IDEs just gum
up the works.

-- 
harry.g.george at boeing.com
6-6M21 BCA CompArch Design Engineering
Phone: (425) 294-4718



More information about the Python-list mailing list