yield_all needed in Python
Francis Girard
francis.girard at free.fr
Tue Mar 1 14:17:35 EST 2005
Hi,
You absolutely and definitively have my vote.
When I first learned the generators , I was even wondering if there was
something wrong in what I do when faced with the sub-generators problem you
describe. I was wondering "why am I doing this extra for-loop ? Is there
something wrong ? Can I return the sub-iterator itself and let the final
upper loop do the job ? But no, I absolutely have to 'yield'. What then ?"
Therefore, the suggestion you make, or something similar, would have actually
ease my learning, at least for me.
Regards,
Francis Girard
Le mardi 1 Mars 2005 19:22, Douglas Alan a écrit :
> For me, it's a matter of providing the ability to implement
> subroutines elegantly within generators. Without yield_all, it is not
> elegent at all to use subroutines to do some of the yielding, since
> the calls to the subroutines are complex, verbose statements, rather
> than simple ones.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list