What's the cost of using hundreds of threads?
P.Rozycki at elka.pw.edu.pl
Wed Mar 2 18:33:22 CET 2005
> In article <d047rn$dtf$1 at julia.coi.pw.edu.pl>,
> Przemysław Różycki <P.Rozycki at elka.pw.edu.pl> wrote:
>> Thanks for your comments on winXP threads implementation. You
confirmed me in conviction that I shouldn't use windows.
>> Personally I use linux with 2.6.10 kernel, so hopefully I don't have
to share your grief. ;)
> ? !? I'm confused, and apparently I'm confusing others.
> The one message I posted in this thread--largely reinforced
> by others--emphasizes only that WinXP is far *better* than
> earlier Win* flavors in its thread management. While I not
> only agree that Windows has disadvantages, but have stopped
> buying it for our company, my reasons have absolutely nothing
> to do with the details of implementation of WinXP.
:) . Ok, perhaps my answer wasn't that precise. I wrote my post only to
say that your discussion on windows' threading performace doesn't
concern me - because my program is written for linux environment. And
yes, I agree that my comment could sound a bit enigmatic.
More information about the Python-list