Python becoming less Lisp-like
ville at spammers.com
Tue Mar 15 13:26:26 CET 2005
>>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Bronger <bronger at physik.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
>>> There would be keywords for static and class methods, no
>>> distinction between Unicode and non-Unicode
>> You couldn't do that 15 years ago because there were no Unicode
>> that time.
Torsten> I've never said that Guido was just too stupid at that
Torsten> time. I only said "but you can definitely see that it's
Torsten> the oldest one". In other words, a Ruby six years older
Torsten> than the real one would have the same problem. And who
Torsten> knows how C# looks like in 10 years.
seems to suggest that Python has better Unicode support than Ruby.
Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
More information about the Python-list