a new design pattern for Python Library?
The Eternal Squire
eternalsquire at comcast.net
Tue Nov 22 20:38:03 EST 2005
Hi,
I tend to use this design pattern a lot in order to aid in
compartmentalizing interchangeable features in a central class that
depend on the central class's data. I know that explicit class
friendship designs syntactic sugar, but I am thinking this should be a
standard design pattern to make friendship dependencies a little more
self documenting.
Opinions?
The Eternal Squire
class Friend (object):
def __init__ (self, friend):
object.__init__ (self)
self.friend = friend
Example use:
class Bar (Friend):
TITLE = None
DEFAULT = 1
def __init__ (self, top):
Friend.__init__ (self, top)
self.data = self.default * self.default
def __str__ (self):
print "%s mode %d default = %d" % (self.__class__.__name__,
self.friend.mode,
self.data)
class ABar (Bar):
DEFAULT = 2
class Foo:
BAR = ABar
def __init__ (self):
self.bar = self.BAR (self)
self.mode = 1
def __str__ (self):
return str (self.bar)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list