Microsoft Hatred FAQ
john at castleamber.com
Sun Oct 16 02:19:39 CEST 2005
joe at invalid.address wrote:
> John Bokma <john at castleamber.com> writes:
>> "David Schwartz" <davids at webmaster.com> wrote:
>> > "Tim Roberts" <timr at probo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:a103l1tkejrc99s0385qjqqhm96d46dpc4 at 4ax.com...
>> >> Part of their behavior really escape me. The whole thing about
>> >> browser wars confuses me. Web browsers represent a zero billion
>> >> dollar a year market. Why would you risk anything to own it?
>> > It really isn't that hard to understand that web-based
>> > applications that work in any browser on any OS threaten
>> > to make it irrelevent what OS you're running.
>> And it's even easier to understand that your statement is nonsense.
>> It doesn't matter which Linux distribution you pick, all use the
>> Linux kernel. On all I can run OpenOffice, and get the same results.
>> Yet people seem to prefer one distribution over one other.
> He was talking about the browser war, and gave a pretty good reason
> why it was important. So you respond by pointing out that people
> choose a linux distribution for personal (non-technical,
> non-marketing) reasons. I think I missed the connection.
web based applications that work with any browser make OS irrelevant ->
not true, since for OpenOffice it doesn't matter which Linux
distribution one runs (or even if it's Linux), yet people seem to make a
point of which distribution they use.
>> > MS has a strong interest in making sure it's important
>> > to be running on one of their OSes.
>> Maybe *they* do have a point :-).
> Which is?
That it *does* matter. It doesn't matter which brand makes your graphics
card, since most stick close to the reference design of the GPU chip
supplier, yet people take the brand in consideration when they buy.
John Small Perl scripts: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Perl programmer available: http://castleamber.com/
I ploink googlegroups.com :-)
More information about the Python-list