Jargons of Info Tech industry
scott at alodar.com
Fri Oct 14 01:54:58 CEST 2005
In article <7xk6ghkflq.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com>,
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:
> Roedy Green <my_email_is_posted_on_my_website at munged.invalid> writes:
> > Next Mr. Phish had to present his passport etc when he got his Thawte
> > ID. Now Interpol has a much better handle on putting him in jail.
> > He can't repudiate his phishing attempt.
> Any underage drinker in a college town can tell you a hundred ways to
> get sufficient fake ID to get around that.
Most such jurisdictions get very excited, though, if that underage
drinker kills someone while driving drunk. Ofttimes, that gets _real_
police attention, rather than occasional bouncer investigation.
Make each recieved spam be worth a buck to the reciever, and the
spammers/phishers/etc will be facing felony charges. I suspect much of
the spamming would stop.
Some, of course, would continue. Pyramid schemes still get proposed,
but their scope is much smaller.
scott at alodar.nospam.com
Java and database consulting for the life sciences
More information about the Python-list