Microsoft Hatred FAQ
john at castleamber.com
Sun Oct 16 00:27:46 CEST 2005
"Martin P. Hellwig" <mhellwig at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
>> You mean like the lamp that keeps burning forever, like Philips has?
> No more like all the hydrogen technologies that shell has in their
> possession for the last decades and only recently has begun to restart
> those projects.
>>> Although Commodore where never serious competitors,
>> Because there programming skills were as worse as MS? I mean, their
>> BASIC had only 2 instuctions: PEEK and POKE?
> eehm Amiga?
Eehm: Acorn Archimedes?
>> Yet you call NT slightly better compared to Windows 95. So you have
>> no clue what you're talking about.
> So I see you never worked serious with 3.5 .
Yeah, that's it, I am sure.
>>> then where we are now. Perhaps we even had a other mainstream
>>> architecture like sparcs and powerpc's.
>> But "crippled" like Intel.
> Yeah right sparc is crippled...
Yeah, right: Sparc is the ultimate goal in processor design, the best of
the best. You think it would have been that good if it was a mainstream
John Small Perl scripts: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Perl programmer available: http://castleamber.com/
I ploink googlegroups.com :-)
More information about the Python-list