Microsoft Hatred FAQ

David Schwartz davids at
Thu Oct 27 19:37:28 CEST 2005

Paul Rubin wrote:

> "David Schwartz" <davids at> writes:

>>> Of course it's legal for non-monopoly companies.  You seem to think
>>> Microsoft's illegal monopoly is an irrelevant detail.  It is not.

>>     What is an "illegal monopoly"?
 It's what Microsoft still stands convicted of having.

    I don't see anything there about what an "illegal monopoly" is or might 
be. Perhaps you could clarify. What do you think you mean when you say 
"illegal monopoly"?


More information about the Python-list mailing list