Microsoft Hatred FAQ
davids at webmaster.com
Thu Oct 27 19:37:28 CEST 2005
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "David Schwartz" <davids at webmaster.com> writes:
>>> Of course it's legal for non-monopoly companies. You seem to think
>>> Microsoft's illegal monopoly is an irrelevant detail. It is not.
>> What is an "illegal monopoly"?
It's what Microsoft still stands convicted of having.
I don't see anything there about what an "illegal monopoly" is or might
be. Perhaps you could clarify. What do you think you mean when you say
More information about the Python-list