which is more 'pythonic' / 'better' ?
gabor
gabor at nekomancer.net
Tue Sep 13 02:54:04 EDT 2005
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Will McGugan" <news at NOwillmcguganSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:4325a3fe$0$525$da0feed9 at news.zen.co.uk...
>
>>You may be right. I always use plural nouns for collections.
>
>
> ditto
>
>>To me 'line' would suggest there was just one of them,
>>so I assumed it was string.
>
>
> I did too.
>
i'm sorry ;) it was a list of strings...
the code was something like:
for line in open('x.y'):
line = line.split('\t')
a better naming would be better it seems :)
gabor
More information about the Python-list
mailing list