Simple DAV server?

[robert]

Ivan Voras wrote:
> robert wrote:
> 
>> maybe thats a good idea to put it on sf.net to boil out all bugs.
>> Yet I like it in that simple default manner, maybe switch on those 
>> additional creation functions with commandline switches (or config 
>> class instance passed to run..(config=None) )
> 
> 
> I'm thinking of making a small separation between the actual WebDAV 
> server (server.py) and the library/libraries that do the actual protocol 
> (davserver.py & fsdav.py). This way, we can still have a simple server 
> (server.py), libraries with new features, and possibly an advanced 
> server (possibly called server_advanced.py or something like that) that 
> can use all those new features.
> 
> I'll submit a project request, and will post here when it's processed, 
> so stay tuned :)
> 

Hello,

what is the current status of Pandav?

KL wrote, he added some more capabs. I'd need MOVE and saw PUT has bugs 
to also not respect URL-quoted folders/elements (with spaces, utf-8 etc.)

Wanted to ask to not double things?

-robert