efficiency of range() and xrange() in for loops

Wed Apr 5 20:54:27 EDT 2006

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:33:16 +0200, Azolex wrote:
> Don't. It's quite funny, thanks.

I guess I should laugh.  :-/

When you read my original articles, did *you* think I was proposing that
range() be changed to always return an iterator?  I thought what I wrote
was pretty clear...
-- 
Steve R. Hastings    "Vita est"
steve at hastings.org    http://www.blarg.net/~steveha