merits of Lisp vs Python
Ken Tilton
kentilton at gmail.com
Sat Dec 9 04:26:02 EST 2006
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> It is a good thing that not every
> hare-brained idea that some random programmer comes up with can be
> implemented as part of the core language.
Well, that's the FUD/strawman, but nothing more. Just a hobgoblin to
keep the Pythonistas from straying. But you have an excuse: Lispniks
always /talk/ about macros giving us the ability to create a DSL. But no
one does. :) Macros mostly hide implementation -- always a good thing --
where functions cannot.
This, btw, is why Norvig brushing off macros with the ability to use
regex to parse a DSL was so disappointing.
I guess your other excuse is that your BDFL says the same thing.
All in all, this is getting pretty funny. I am starting to picture you
all (including GvR) running around with your hands over your ears going
woo-woo so you cannot hear what we are saying.
:)
ken
--
Algebra: http://www.tilton-technology.com/LispNycAlgebra1.htm
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for thirty-five
years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally
won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
"I'll say I'm losing my grip, and it feels terrific."
-- Smiling husband to scowling wife, New Yorker cartoon
More information about the Python-list
mailing list