merits of Lisp vs Python

[JShrager at gmail.com]

greg wrote:
> JShrager at gmail.com wrote:
> > So if you guys would just fix
> > your language by adding homogeneous syntax and all that it brings with
> > it (macros, compilers, etc) we'd be happy to use your version of Lisp,
> > and all its great libraries, instead of ours! :-)
>
> But if we did that, it wouldn't be Python any
> more, it'd be Lisp. And then all those great
> libraries wouldn't work with it, because they're
> for Python, not Lisp. :-(

Does the word "TRONDANT" hold some special meaning for you?