merits of Lisp vs Python
greg
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Fri Dec 15 06:18:13 EST 2006
Ken Tilton wrote:
> So this:
> (defmethod tf-reverse (id (eql ',sub-id)) resx (drv-opnds tf drv))
> , at reverser)
>
> becomes this:
>
> (defmethod tf-reverse ((id (eql ',sub-id)) tf drv
> &aux (opnds (drv-opnds tf drv)))
> (loop for resx in (results drv)
> , at reverser))
I don't see why you can't just write a function that
loops over the results and calls the user's reversal
function for each one.
def reverse_multiple(skill, resx_list, opnds):
for resx in rex_list:
skill.reverse(resx, opnds)
There's no need to macro-expand this code into every
reversal function, when it can be done once as part of
the framework that calls the reversal functions.
--
Greg
More information about the Python-list
mailing list