merits of Lisp vs Python
Lars Rune Nøstdal
larsnostdal at gmail.com
Sat Dec 9 09:23:00 EST 2006
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:36:02 +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:38:02 -0800, Wolfram Fenske wrote:
>
>> if Common Lisp didn't have CLOS, its object system, I could write my own
>> as a library and it would be just as powerful and just as easy to use as
>> the system Common Lisp already provides. Stuff like this is impossible
>> in other languages.
>
> Dude. Turing Complete. Don't you Lisp developers know anything about
> computer science?
>
> Anything any language can do is possible in any other language, if you are
> willing to write your own libraries.
*lol* Good luck with that attitude:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troglodyte.htm
..or did you forget to add "in theory"; which is of course what everyone
already knows as they see their compilers do it every day.
--
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://nostdal.org/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list