merits of Lisp vs Python
John Thingstad
john.thingstad at chello.no
Sat Dec 9 17:23:07 EST 2006
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:49:59 +0100, mystilleef <mystilleef at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Donkeys have wings.
>
? You attitude towards CLOS is obviously insane.
>> In the windows world the best way to access system libraries are
>> via .NET. Thus each language inventing it's own libraries is quickly
>> becoming
>
> You're only proving my point. Why do you think most windows developers
> use .NET?
>
Lisp can also use .NET. .NET =/= C#
>> Python is fine if you approach programming as Lego, simply gluing
>> together
>> libraries.
>
> You mean it's fine for what 90% of programmers do?
>
Yes CRUD (Create, Read Update, Delete)..
Sure you can do that in any languge..
Not sure I would call it programming.
>> But if you want to do some serious algorithmic's you may find that it is
>> just to slow.
>
> Slow for users who aren't familiar with Psyco, Pyrex and C extensions,
> sure.
>
Even then..
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list